Watch the former author of Florida school security speak out on Parkland


Ken O'Keefe Exposes US Wars of Aggression.

The death of the mediawhores





There are those who would encourage you to get a mask and a metal pipe, join ANTIFA and attack anyone who wears a Trump hat or may have patriotic leanings. Actually, that is a perfect example of Fascism. The most well known Fascistic government in modern times is 1930's and 40's Italy.  Benito Mussolini was the dictator of that nation during that time. He was quoted as saying that Fascism would be more accurately termed “corporatism”. That is the unification between government and large corporations. The actions of some of the largest corporations of the past couple of weeks shows this is where we are.

In the early part of the last century, President Theodore Roosevelt was labeled a 'trust buster”. Indeed much of the last century saw our central government break up companies that became too large and dominated their sector of the economy. Even as recently as the late 1970's and early 1980's our government broke up AT&T, who had a monopoly on phone communications. Well, those days are gone.

Now only 6 corporations control 90% of what we see, read and hear in the media. Facebook, Youtube, Microsoft, Amazon and Walmart have a stranglehold on their sectors. They control hundreds of billions of dollars. They can put anyone that competes with them, or displeases them, out of business. Where's ANTIFA protesting them?

Ideally, the government should be prosecuting all of them and others, for anti-trust violations. ----not with this bunch of crooks---. No, for that we'll have to wait for the upcoming economic collapse. In the meantime, we can easily change to alternatives in social media and browsers. Get rid of Facebook. Get rid of Youtube. Say good-bye to Mozilla and the mediawhores. There are now alternatives popping up in competition with them. My browser is now Yandex. You may want a different one. Alex Jones is now on Bitchute. I get my news from RT. It may take a little time, but it is time for us to pull the rug out from any of these corporate masters that have decided to move from business to control.

Bruce                                       New World Order News

There is a silent marriage between big government and big business. It’s called fascism, or was in Italy. We have much the same thing in America.
Big business has and will promote every ideology and philosophy known to man to disguise its madness for profits and government favors. All governments are fronts for monopoly capitalism (fascism). America is not a capitalist system by any stretch. This is obvious to any sober person.
Government benefits big business. Big business benefits government. There’s a revolving door between top brass in the multinational corporations and the halls of power in the District of Criminals. They run and populate the president’s cabinet offices and the alphabet soup regulatory agencies. (For evidence, go to the membership roster of the Council on Foreign Relations and see how many names you recognize from government, and study the bios of those you don’t.) In return, government policy is crafted and designed to enrich and favor big business.

The Big Tech companies are no exception and, in fact, prove the rule. Big Tech got/gets massive infusions from the national treasury – and are also government contractors — and in return they scarf up copious amounts of data and other information on their users and supply it to big government; their promises of data security notwithstanding.

With the corporate propaganda media losing its control over the flow of information, Big Tech is stepping in. And it’s partnering with the MSM and the power brokers who operate behind the scenes in an attempt to stifle any thought that falls outside the mainstream.
It’s doing this not just with government’s blessing, but with the threat of regulation or something more, as Communist Senator Chris Murphy from
Connecticut showed with his implied threat via Twitter.

Chris Murphy
Infowars is the tip of a giant iceberg of hate and lies that uses sites like Facebook and YouTube to tear our nation apart. These companies must do more than take down one website. The survival of our democracy depends on it.

When a major U.S. politician states that something “must” happen, then there is the implied threat that if “something” doesn’t happen then government will respond with “something” more.

Senate democrats are already circulating plans to take over the internet and impose all manner of privacy-invading and speech-stifling laws.
Remember, we told you that everything that is public policy is politically correct, and everything that is politically correct is public policy. It’s how governments ensure conformity and control.

CNN, the Communist News Network that is a purveyor of much of today’s fake news, overtly advocated for the removal of Alex Jones’ websites and podcasts from technology platforms in an attempt to drive him out of business. Facebook, YouTube, Apple, Pinterest, Spotify, Stitcher, YouPorn, LinkedIn and MailChimp all obliged and banned Infowars last week. This week, the comment platform Disqus (which we use on Personal Liberty®, for now) and the video platform Vimeo joined in the purge.

CNN – known for cutting off guests being interviewed live when they venture into subjects contrary to the official narrative – claims to support free speech. But when Newseum, the museum of news media established “to increase public understanding of the importance of a free press and the First Amendment” began selling President Donald Trump’s MAGA hats and t-shirts with the words “Fake News” in the CNN-style font on them, CNN sparked a social justice mob response that forced the museum to pull the items from its gift shop and issue an apology.

Other media outlets have joined in on the pile-on against Infowars and other deliverers of alternative news, claiming that “hate speech” (a nebulous, meaningless term) and “racism” (a term that was so overused in the Obama years that it, too, has lost its meaning) are “unacceptable” and have no place in a civilized society. In response, the media and tech giants have assumed the role of the government’s thought and speech police, with government sanction.

But it’s not just Infowars and so-called “alt-right” (another meaningless, fabricated term) media organs being removed from Big Tech; libertarians and so-called “alt-left” and far left sites are beginning to be purged.

No less than the U.S. Supreme Court, in Matal v. Tam, affirmed there is no such thing as “hate speech”:


The media and leftist elites love to call Trump a fascist, but in doing so they are engaging in Orwellian-style newspeak. Nationalism, crudeness or racism (not that we believe Trump is a racist) do not make one fascist. However, banning contrarian thought (21st century book burning) and beating people into submission – physically and verbally – are fascist tactics. The fascists of the left-wing terror group Antifa are far more fascist in their behavior and philosophy than Trump.

As historian Michael Leeden writes for Forbes:



This newspeak is dangerous to liberty.

Mind control through government propaganda has overshadowed any physical threat to our physical security. We are already in a psychological jail at the mercy of the propaganda ministry.

This is what is meant by benevolent totalitarianism. America has German-style fascism, just without the jackboots.

You don’t have to know that you are a slave to be one. Military occupation is no longer necessary (visibly). Total war goes on against the people all the time. Remember that corporations are also engaged in a corporate repeal of the 2nd Amendment, again with government blessing if not government sanction (see, Obama’s Operation Chokepoint).

Few people ever come to the realism that big government in cooperation with big business (fascism) work together to perpetually extract labor, wealth and liberty from the people.

The key to this conspiracy is to keep the people dependent on the government under what is euphemistically called “public policy.”



I know, this is depressing. Yes, we all know a collapse is coming, but it hasn't really come yet and we'll probably all die before it comes for real. At least that's what some of us hope. Meanwhile, back on Earth, it has just been disclosed that the global debt has hit $250,000,000,000,000. No, it can never be paid and yes, it continues to grow. Not only that, but international bankers who created this money out of thin air, get to charge interest on this debt. Even with low interest rates, it amounts to trillions of dollars every year. You can see why they are not anxious to stop this scam.

So what happens now? There have been many examples of countries getting into debt that cannot be paid. There was post world war 1 Germany where it took a wheel barrow of money to buy a loaf of bread. Then there was Zimbabwe where they were printing 100 trillion dollar notes. In fact, all of the great empires of the past experienced these type of collapses due to excessive debt. Here's what has never happened. A total financial collapse due to debt has never covered the whole world. Thanks to the global economy and tying in all of the central banks around the world, the practice of printing money out of thin air, then immediately charging interest to governments on that currency has doomed us all. This debt continues to build. It will never go down and it will not and cannot ever be paid. There are not enough resources in the world to pay it. It isn't even close.

It's anyone's guess when this will all come crashing down, but I doubt that it will be very long. Once it happens, it will start in a matter of minutes and within hours all of the banks in the world will stop dispensing money. It has to happen that way as the creditors ( those who hold the 250 trillion dollars) will demand their money and since it can't be paid, they will try to seize assets. One can only imagine the world wide chaos that will ensue.

Yeah, I hope it takes many, many years, but then again I hop to stay in good health and live to 200.

Bruce                                 New World Order News

As governments raise taxes to cope with their unending spending habits, people are increasingly being forced to supplement their own income with loans. And according to most financial experts, this debt problem is so big that it will usher in a global economic collapse of epic proportions.
According to the Institute of International Finance’s latest Global Debt Monitor, the amount of debt held in the world rose by the biggest amount in two years during the first quarter of 2018. It grew by $8 trillion to hit a new all-time high of $247 trillion, up from $238 trillion as of December 31, 2017.  And that’s up by $30 trillion from the end of 2016.

Global debt is staggering to the point most of it will never be repaid and as governments continue their spending sprees and the debts keep mounting, the future of the economy looks bleak. There is more than enough economic data out there to show there could be an economic collapse and stock market crash in 2018. Bill Gross stated in 2017 that “our highly levered financial system is like a truckload of nitroglycerin on a bumpy road”. One wrong move and the whole thing could blow sky high, wrote the Epic Economist. Once this bubble pops, it will fling the globe into a financial crisis of epic proportions never before seen.

According to Financial Times, it is becoming clear that the global monetary policy is now caught in a debt trap of its own making. Continuing on the current monetary path is ineffective and increasingly dangerous. But any reversal also involves great risks. It stands to reason that the odds of another crisis blowing up will continue to rise. –Ready Nutrition

The Epic Economist also has a video out detailing how all of this came to pass.  It’s easy enough to understand, yet most still can’t get past their own preconceived notions and biases to comprehend that this will be the fault of governments and those who continue to look to rulers or masters to solve their problems.

“It is all about taking money from us and transferring it into government pockets. And then, taking money from government pockets, and transferring it into the hands of the elite. It’s a game that’s been going on for generations and its time for the humanity to say that ‘enough is enough’.” -Epic Economist
The future of the global economy doesn’t look promising based on the vast amount of debt and wealth being transferred from people to their masters.  We are living in economic slavery and until humanity understands that, the only other option is an economic crisis.

It comes as a bit of a surprise the infamous Keneysian economist Bernanke would express concerns over the government’s inability to decrease spending.  But now that he has, will Americans heed the warning and protect themselves against the next financial crisis? –SHTFPlan

There are ways to prepare for a financial crisis, although an ongoing and global crash could complicate things for preppers. But there are still ways to prepare and an open and educated mind is step one.  If you still believe the government and global elites have your best interests in mind, you probably also don’t anticipate a global economic crash, and therefore, are not going to prepare.  For the rest of us, taking on a “prepper’s mindset” will give you the upper hand in any financial crisis.

“If we have learned one thing studying the history of disasters, it is this: those who are prepared have a better chance at survival than those who are not.” -Tess Pennington, author of The Prepper’s Blueprint



The answer is pretty much the same as all of our wonderful wars. The subject article covers the ever increasing list of enemies our government masters are adding. We have North Korea, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Yemen, Syria, Russia, Iran, elements in Libya, Iraq and Sudan and now, just this past couple of weeks, Turkey. Military experts have traditionally warned against fighting a 2 front war. Unless our government is ready to unleash nuclear warheads all over the world, there is no way our nation, with only 5 % of the world's population, can fight everybody at the same time. Sooner or later our people and resources will become exhausted.

That brings me to Afghanistan. Almost 17 years and over $1,000,000,000,000 have been spent with no perceivable progress there whatsoever. Have we not learned anything from Vietnam? Afghanistan has been correctly labeled “The graveyard of Empires”. It is only a matter of time before this ill advised war adds our nation to that list. Yesterday, I spoke of the upcoming collapse. Future historians will undoubtedly attempt to list the causes of our future downfall. One that can fill a chapter in that book is the war in Afghanistan.

It is amazing with all of the military expertise, they cannot accept the fact that not all battles have to be won. Sometimes a strategic retreat can preserve the military for future defense. One of the major mistakes Hitler made during World War 2, was his failure to recognize the disastrous decision to remain in Russia after it became obvious the operation would not succeed and would sap vital resources. We have failed in Syria and are still there. We have failed in Iraq and are still there and we have failed in Afghanistan and are still there.

Bruce                                         New World Order News

By Patrick J. Buchanan

August 14, 2018 "Information Clearing House" -  Friday, deep into the 17th year of America’s longest war, Taliban forces overran Ghazni, a provincial capital that sits on the highway from Kabul to Kandahar.

The ferocity of the Taliban offensive brought U.S. advisers along with U.S. air power, including a B-1 bomber, into the battle.
"As the casualty toll in Ghazni appeared to soar on Sunday," The Wall Street Journal reported, "hospitals were spilling over with dead bodies, corpses lay in Ghazni’s streets, and gunfire and shelling were preventing relatives from reaching cemeteries to bury their dead."

In Yemen Monday, a funeral was held in the town square of Saada for 40 children massacred in an air strike on a school bus by Saudis or the UAE, using U.S.-provided planes and bombs.

"A crime by America and its allies against the children of Yemen," said a Houthi rebel leader.
Yemen is among the worst humanitarian situations in the world, and in creating that human-rights tragedy, America has played an indispensable role.
Are You Tired Of The Lies And Non-Stop Propaganda?

No Advertising - No Government Grants - This Is Independent Media
The U.S. also has 2,000 troops in Syria. Our control, with our Kurd allies, of that quadrant of Syria east of the Euphrates is almost certain to bring us into eventual conflict with a regime and army insisting that we get out of their country.

As for our relations with Turkey, they have never been worse.
President Erdogan regards our Kurd allies in Syria as collaborators of his own Kurdish-terrorist PKK. He sees us as providing sanctuary for exile cleric Fethullah Gulen, whom Erdogan says was behind the attempted coup in 2016 in which he and his family were targeted for assassination.
Last week, when the Turkish currency, the lira, went into a tailspin, President Trump piled on, ratcheting up U.S. tariffs on Turkish aluminum and steel. If the lira collapses and Turkey cannot meet its debt obligations, Erdogan will lay the blame at the feet of the Americans and Trump.

Which raises a question: How many quarrels, conflicts and wars, and with how many adversaries, can even the mighty United States sustain?
In November, the most severe of U.S. sanctions will be imposed on Iran. Among the purposes of this policy: Force as many nations as possible to boycott Iranian oil and gas, sink its economy, bring down the regime.

Iran has signaled a possible response to its oil and gas being denied access to world markets. This August, Iranian gunboats exercised in the Strait of Hormuz, backing up a regime warning that if Iranian oil cannot get out of the Gulf, the oil of Arab OPEC nations may be bottled up inside as well. Last week, Iran test-fired an anti-ship ballistic missile.

Iran has rejected Trump’s offer of unconditional face-to-face talks, unless the U.S. first lifts the sanctions imposed after withdrawing from the nuclear deal.
With no talks, a U.S. propaganda offensive underway, the Iranian rial sinking and the economy sputtering, regular demonstrations against the regime, and new sanctions scheduled for November, it is hard to see how a U.S. collision with Tehran can be avoided.
This holds true as well for Vladimir Putin’s Russia.

Last week, the U.S. imposed new sanctions on Russia for its alleged role in the nerve-agent poisoning of ex-Russian spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter in the British town of Salisbury.

Though the U.S. had already expelled 60 Russian diplomats for the poisoning, and Russia vehemently denies responsibility – and conclusive evidence has not been made public and the victims have not been heard from – far more severe sanctions are to be added in November.

Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev is warning that such a U.S. move would cross a red line: "If … a ban on bank operations or currency use follows, it will amount to a declaration of economic war. … And it will warrant a response with economic means, political means and, if necessary, other means."
That the sanctions are biting is undeniable. Like the Turkish lira and Iranian rial, the Russian ruble has been falling and the Russian people are feeling the pain.
Last week also, a U.S. Poseidon reconnaissance plane, observing China’s construction of militarized islets in the South China Sea, was told to "leave immediately and keep out."

China claims the sea as its national territory.

And North Korea’s Kim Jong Un apparently intends to hold onto his arsenal of nuclear weapons.
"We’re waiting for the North Koreans to begin the process of denuclearization, which they committed to in Singapore and which they’ve not yet done," John Bolton told CNN last week.

A list of America’s adversaries here would contain the Taliban, the Houthis of Yemen, Bashar Assad of Syria, Erdogan’s Turkey, Iran, North Korea, Russia and China – a pretty full plate.

Are we prepared to see these confrontations through, to assure the capitulation of our adversaries? What do we do if they continue to defy us?
And if it comes to a fight, how many allies will we have in the battles and wars that follow?
Was this the foreign policy America voted for?



Over the past few years I have posted a number of articles and documents that indicate America is destined for an economic and government collapse ( You can't have one without the other). Yes, there is an unpayable debt and yes, there is a dramatic decline in the academic performance of our youth and yes, we now have several wars going on all around the world with no end in sight and yes, we have almost 100 million people who are not working and yes, we have people streaming across our border with no vetting whatsoever, but that's old news. We've been seeing these signs and yet, most in the United States continue their lives as usual.

So, what are the unmistakable signs of an nation about to collapse. The government itself, will tell you. Whether it's the Roman Empire or the Egyptians or the Spanish or any other empire, the signs are always the same. At the time of the end, government corruption goes out of control. We are there. A government empire over extends itself in wars of adventure. We are there. A government spends more money than they take in, thus running up large debts. We are there. The populace having been spoiled by prosperity becomes more and more decadent. We are there. Domestic violence pops up all around the country. We are there. An ever increasing police presence uses ever increasing violence to maintain control. We are there. Now, just in the past few weeks, one of the final signs of collapse has reared its' ugly head --- censorship. No collapsing empire allows citizens to criticize it or speak opinions that are not approved by the State. We are now, there.

If one looks at the Bill of Rights, our founders were acutely aware of these signs. The Bill of Rights are correctly termed “disabilities” in that the government is prohibited from overriding these rights.

When will the final nail in the coffin come? Let's hope it's a long way away, but apparently our government masters don't think so. The millions of people that still believe “it can't happen here” will continue to ignore all of the signs outlined. As long as they have their job, house, car, TV, vacations etc., they don't care. When they no longer have these things, that's when they will care and it won't be pretty. When the economy finally comes down, that's when the end will be. You tell me how long that will take? This year, our central government will devote nearly $1,000,000,000,000 on wars and support for wars. Our central government also will send $500,000,000,000 to the Federal Reserve to pay interest on the national debt. That's 1 and ½ TRILLION dollars. In order to service these expenses our central government will borrow another 1 TRILLION dollars this year.

Our government and corporate masters are showing desperation. Now people are not even allowed to state unapproved opinions. Then again, those who depend on lies, hate the truth.

Bruce                                            New World Order News

One of Stone’s Rules is “The only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about.” Even I may have taken exception to that rule last Friday.
If you followed the news last Friday, you know that my longtime friend Kristin Davis testified before Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s grand jury, that my longtime associate and wingman Andrew Miller was held in contempt for his refusal to testify for the grand jury, and that a subpoena was dropped on Randy Credico who, despite his public denials, was the source who first told me that Wikileaks had the goods on Hillary and would release them in October. It was a Deep State Trifecta!

Andrew Miller’s contempt citation is a bit more complicated and his appeal may be problematic for Mueller down the road.
Mueller is running a criminally abusive, constitutionally unaccountable, professionally and politically incestuous conspiracy of ethically conflicted cronies colluding to violate my Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights and those of almost everyone who had any sort of political or personal association with me in the last 10 years.

He has conducted a supposedly comprehensive investigation of a very narrow and limited issue as an open-ended, totally limitless Grand Prosecution, with absolutely no articulable or even identifiable criminal predicate to substantiate it as a lawful investigation, even under ordinary circumstances.
Mueller’s team of partisan prosecutors seek to prove the unprovable — that I received allegedly hacked e-mails from the Russians or Wikileaks and passed them on to Donald Trump. This threadbare false narrative is harped on endlessly by the slugs at MSNBC and other despicable “fake news” outlets.
Now, because of the accuracy of my tweets — in which I merely followed the tweets of Wikileaks and the many public interviews of Wikileaks publisher Julian Assange — Mueller and his hit-men seek to frame some ludicrous charge of “defrauding the United States.”

This is, of course, based on a false and unproven assumption that Assange is a Russian agent and Wikileaks is a Russian front — neither of which has been proven in a court of law. Interestingly Assange himself has said, “Roger Stone has never said or tweeted anything we at Wikileaks had not already said publicly.”

The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal also had to recycle “news” of my entirely innocuous exchange on Twitter direct message with a persona who calls himself Guccifer 2.0 (who our Intelligence Agencies insist is a Russian hacker despite much evidence to the contrary). Based on its 24-word content, context and timing, the exchange is meaningless and benign and took place long after Wikileaks has published the allegedly hacked DNC material. This mundane exchange was turned over to the House Intelligence Committee at the time of my testimony.
It proves nothing!

I testified for four hours under oath before the House Intelligence Committee. That testimony is 100-percent accurate and true despite claims to the contrary from hyper-partisans Rep. Adam Schiff, Eric Swallwell and their ilk.
I addressed every one of these issues in my testimony. I stand by every word.

Additionally, Mueller’s hit team is poking into every aspect of my personal, private, family, social, business and political life — presumably to conjure up some bogus charge or charges to use to pressure me to plead guilty to their Wikileaks fantasy and testify against Donald Trump who I have known intimately for almost 40 years.

Even more chilling is the fact that I have learned that — in this effort to destroy me — the government began reading my e-mails and text messages and monitoring my phone calls as early as 2016.

I believe that I, like Carter Page and Paul Manafort, was subject to an illegal FISA warrant in 2016, as the New York Times reported on January 20, 2017. The New York Times published this claim in a page-one story on the same day as President Trump’s inauguration ceremony.

A whistleblower has told my lawyers where my name and the fact that application had been made for a FISA warrant on me was redacted from the stunning Carter Page FISA warrant application released by the FBI last week with 300 of 400 pages blacked out.

A FISA warrant can only be issued against a U.S. citizen who is engaged in espionage for a foreign power against the United States. I have never engaged in any such thing.

In other words, heavy-handed federal prosecutors have had full access to my e-mails, text messages and cell calls since 2016 and are monitoring my communications now, and they still have no evidence of Russian collusion or any Wikileaks collaboration.

We also now know that at least one FBI informant in the United States on an informant’s visa approached me in May 2016 in an effort to entrap me and compromise Donald Trump. I declined his proposal to “buy dirt on Hillary.” There is now substantial evidence that a second FBI informant may have infiltrated my political operations in 2016. Stand by.

Incredibly, leading the questioning of witnesses before the Grand Jury about me is Jeannie Rhee, who in private practice represented the Clinton Foundation in the Hillary e-mail scandal that is front and center in the special prosecutor’s investigation of me! Can you say conflict of interest?

I have been ably served by two fine lawyers, Grant Smith and Rob Buschel, who won dismissal of a harassment lawsuit based on the same Wikileaks/Russian conspiracy theory by an Obama directed legal foundation in D.C. last month. No evidence to support this false narrative was produced in court other than a slew of fake news clippings from lefty media sites.

I have recently reached agreement to retain a highly respected and nationally known attorney who has represented Donald Trump to join my legal team and lead my defense.

Needless to say, all of this has had a terrible toll on my business, my family’s finances, the promotion of my new book “Stone’s Rules” and my life in general.

The cost of dismissal of the D.C. lawsuit; the DNC lawsuit against me (and a dozen others including Donald Trump, Jr. and the Trump campaign); the ongoing investigation of the Senate Intelligence Committee (which does not have a single pro-Trump  Republican member); and the ongoing inquisition by the Special Counsel has wiped out my tiny savings and caused me to liquidate the small fund generated by my book sales for college education. My defense could ultimately cost as much as $2 million.

On-line stories that I am worth $20 million are completely false, fake news posted to hurt my efforts to raise the money to defend myself from the coming Mueller onslaught. I am not a wealthy man. At 66 years old, I work hard to support my family.

It is now clear Mueller may seek to conjure up some bogus legal offense against me in an effort to force me to testify against the President, who I have known for forty years. Additionally, they seek to silence me now and, during their coming assault, to impeach the President.
Friends who want to help can go to As for me, I am girding for battle and preparing to fight.

It looks like the recent purging of Infowars content from social media was not enough as the powers-that-be have now taken down altogether in what appears to be an outright attack. was throwing an “error 521” message on Tuesday which means the “web server is down.”
At 1:20 pm central time a diagram a diagram can still be seen displayed when readers visit which alludes to a “host” issue.
Sometime around 1:30 pm central time a new message was posted to which read: “Infowars is under attack! Please visit our other channels now.”

This comes after Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) put out a call to ban Infowars altogether.
On Monday, Chris Murphy tweeted: “Infowars is the tip of a giant iceberg of hate and lies that uses sites like Facebook and YouTube to tear our nation apart. These companies must do more than take down one website. The survival of our democracy depends on it.”

Chris Murphy
Infowars is the tip of a giant iceberg of hate and lies that uses sites like Facebook and YouTube to tear our nation apart. These companies must do more than take down one website. The survival of our democracy depends on it.
5:26 PM - Aug 6, 2018

Alex Jones responds via Twitter:
Alex Jones
Alex Jones' Statement On Infowars Being Taken Down!
4:18 PM - Aug 14, 2018

“This is happening and is down,” Jones explained.



The subject article covers studies conducted by 2 government agencies, U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey authorized by the Department of Commerce and data from the federal Election Assistance Commission. Statistics from those agencies show there are 3.5 Million More Registered Voters Than Live Adults, but it gets worse.

It's not bad enough that there is evidence of a potential 3.5 million fraudulent votes, how about those who haven't registered. I know for a fact that not every adult in the U.S. is registered to vote. I'm one of them. Then there are those who have felony records and those who are adjudged mentally incompetent. So, how many millions of fraudulently registered voters are there?

It's time. It's time for the American electorate to say enough. We are no longer waiting for a bunch of crooks to correct this fraud which they helped to create. If you think your vote will have an impact, you are wrong. You are wrong because, as Former Chicago Mayor Daily was once quoted as saying, “just let me know how many votes you need and I'll take care of the rest”. What if they held a crooked election and nobody came?

Bruce                                       New World Order News


Elections: American democracy has a problem — a voting problem. According to a new study of U.S. Census data, America has more registered voters than actual live voters. It’s a troubling fact that puts our nation’s future in peril.

The data come from Judicial Watch’s Election Integrity Project. The group looked at data from 2011 to 2015 produced by the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey, along with data from the federal Election Assistance Commission.

As reported by the National Review’s Deroy Murdock, who did some numbers-crunching of his own, “some 3.5 million more people are registered to vote in the U.S. than are alive among America’s adult citizens. Such staggering inaccuracy is an engraved invitation to voter fraud.”

Murdock counted Judicial Watch’s state-by-state tally and found that 462 U.S. counties had a registration rate exceeding 100% of all eligible voters. That’s

3.552 million people, who Murdock calls “ghost voters.” And how many people is that? There are 21 states that don’t have that many people.
Nor are these tiny, rural counties or places that don’t have the wherewithal to police their voter rolls.

California, for instance, has 11 counties with more registered voters than actual voters. Perhaps not surprisingly — it is deep-Blue State California, after all — 10 of those counties voted heavily for Hillary Clinton.

Los Angeles County, whose more than 10 million people make it the nation’s most populous county, had 12% more registered voters than live ones, some 707,475 votes. That’s a huge number of possible votes in an election.

But, Murdock notes, “California’s San Diego County earns the enchilada grande. Its 138% registration translates into 810,966 ghost voters.”
State by state, this is an enormous problem that needs to be dealt with seriously. Having so many bogus voters out there is a temptation to voter fraud. In California, where Hillary Clinton racked up a massive majority over Trump, it would have made little difference.

But in other states, and in smaller elections, voter fraud could easily turn elections. A hundred votes here, a hundred votes there, and things could be very different. As a Wikipedia list of close elections shows, since just 2000 there have been literally dozens of elections at the state, local and federal level decided by 100 votes or fewer.

And, in at least two nationally important elections in recent memory, the outcome was decided by a paper-thin margin: In 2000, President Bush beat environmental activist and former Vice President Al Gore by just 538 votes.



My money is on “nothing”. There have been dozens of examples of blatant vote fraud for years. Indeed, in Ohio, back in 2004 Cuyahoga County, Ohio had more votes cast in the 2004 Presidential election than there were voters. Jill Stein's request for a recount in the 2016 Presidential election found massive vote fraud in Detroit, Milwaukee, Madison, Wisconsin, Clark County, Nevada, Philadelphia, as well as many districts in California. In the end, almost no one was punished for these crimes. They commit crimes because they can.

So now, in the latest special election in Ohio, the dead are walking. The voter roles show people as old as 218 years old, eligible to vote. 170 voters were over the age of 116. It's time for those who are eligible to vote to stay home. Maybe they could organize a “stay home” demonstration. If we can't count on honest elections, we don't have a republic. We have rulers.

Bruce                                         New World Order News

It’s becoming clear that Democrats will stop at nothing to get their “blue wave” to happen.

In Tuesday’s special election for Ohio’s 12th Congressional District, Republican Troy Balderson won by a narrow margin — around 1,600 votes.
That’s less than 1 percent of the total number of votes in the entire district, making the election too close to call at the moment and requiring a recount under Ohio law.

Additionally, more than 3,000 provisional ballots still have to be counted — nearly twice the number of votes in the winning margin — so Balderson’s victory is far from assured.

Such a slim margin in this special election has brought to light the dangerous consequences voter fraud can have for those who play fair.
According to expert Eric Eggers, research director at the Government Accountability Institute, 170 registered voters in Ohio’s 12th Congressional District are listed as being “over 116 years old.”

Considering that the world’s oldest living person is a 115-year-old resident of Japan, this is a big problem.

“That’s 10 percent of Balderson’s current margin of victory, pending provisional ballots,” Eggers wrote. “And 72 voters over the age of 116 who ‘live’ in Balderson’s district cast ballots in the 2016 election.”

“FINDS.” Ohio race just got closer after county finds hundreds of uncounted votes.

Definitely challenge those votes. It’s really odd how they always ‘find’ uncounted votes when the Dem just barely loses, but those votes never seem to materialize when the Repub candidate just barely loses.

Bill Mitchell- Isn’t it weird how “magically discovered votes” always seem to disproportionately favor the Democrat Candidate?


Entire West Virginia Supreme Court Facing Impeachment

Do we dare dream there will actually be elected representatives removing crooks from public office? Well, in West Virginia, that may actually happen. The subject article covers numerous examples of outright stealing of taxpayer funds for personal use by justices on the West Virginia Supreme Court. After all, one can't blame them. One only has to look at the trillions of dollars being stolen from taxpayers from many government officials. There is rarely any consequences for these actions. Remember the $5000 toilet seat?

I hope these crooks get tossed out. I also hope these crooks get prosecuted and go to prison. Now ---- seeing the possibilities, can we PLEASE go after the rest? Hillary et all. Anyone?

Bruce                                                    New World Order News

Delegates of West Virginia’s House Judiciary Committee took a stunningly drastic step on Tuesday, approving articles of impeachment against every single remaining justice on the state Supreme Court of Appeals, the Hill and other outlets are reporting. Justice Menis Ketchum resigned his job last month and subsequently pleaded guilty on a federal charge of wire fraud.

“I think the overwhelming evidence we saw was there was an atmosphere of entitlement and cavalier disregard for the expenditure of taxpayer money. It’s unfortunate the entire court seems to be infected by that atmosphere.”

We felt like we had no choice but to recommend the impeachment for each justice,” the committee’s chairman John Shott (R-Mercer) laments.
Shott was “flabbergasted.” It’s “absolutely incredible” to him, “and just basically reinforces the perception that the court feels they’re not a co-equal branch; they’re a superior branch and not subject to the same rules the rest of us are.”

The proceedings are “making West Virginia political history,” notes Dominion Post. “It’s really a sad day for the state, and nobody should be celebrating,” reminds Shott.

One justice is in especially hot water. Eight of the fourteen impeachment articles were directed at Justice Allen Loughry, who separately faces a 23-count federal indictment.

Loughry’s wasn’t a federal case until he turned it into one as reported by Conservative Daily Post. That’s when West Virginia’s taxpayers learned that Loughry’s fellow justices seemed just as corrupt.

To draw attention away from himself when his office renovation came under fire, Loughry approached the FBI “to report his own concerns about spending by other justices of the Supreme Court.” As he went down, he dragged the rest with him.

Loughry spent $363,013.43 to refurbish his office but Justice Robin Davis had him beat. Her remodeling job cost $500,278.23. Chief Justice Margaret Workman and Justice Beth Walker weren’t much better, laying out $111,035.19 and $130,654.55, respectively.

That’s when the FBI discovered Loughry was “using a government vehicle and credit card on personal trips.” He also submitted “mileage claims for reimbursement for a government vehicle he used.”

According to FBI Assistant Special Agent in Charge Nick Boshears, “Public corruption is a top investigative priority. It erodes public confidence and undermines the rule of law.”

The Gazette-Mail reports the judge was charged with “mail fraud, wire fraud, making false statements to a federal agent multiple times, obstruction of justice, and witness tampering.” He goes to trial in October.

As Conservative Daily Post reported recently, Loughry’s arrest was a “huge development.” Tuesday’s mass impeachment vote is historically earthshaking.
Lawmakers charged each of the leaders of the state’s judicial branch with separate violations, all of them serious.

A total of 14 articles were divided among four individual judges for things like, “unnecessary and lavish spending of taxpayer dollars, maladministration, corruption, and neglect of duty,” the Charleston Gazette-Mail notes.

Schools in the state suffered and tightened their belts while it is alleged the justices “used state resources and money to line their pockets and fund their lifestyles,” the local paper also reported.

Next, the impeachment articles go to a full session of the state House, then they need a two-thirds majority vote in the Senate before the impeachment trials begin, also in the Senate.

All four of the justices named for impeachment have at least two remaining years on their terms. If convicted, they will be barred from public office in the state.

If the justices are eventually removed from the bench, Governor Jim Justice would make temporary appointments. The Gazette-Mail relates that “a special election to replace them would take place May 2020.”

During a press conference, Justice admitted the scandal is “a black eye that we don’t need. I’m sure we’ll work our way through it.”

In addition to the charges of lavishly spending taxpayer money to refurbish their offices, the justices allegedly “signed off on a policy to circumvent state law by paying senior status judges as contractors” which let them get around salary limits imposed by the state legislature.

Loughry was the one to start the fight when he had an antique desk moved from the state’s property warehouse to his home office.

He meant to keep it, but when one of the other justices wanted it for herself, he decided to have the movers pick it back up, again at taxpayer expense, several outlets are reporting.

Justice Loughry also hypocritically and illegally billed taxpayers for a trip to the Greenbrier resort in White Sulphur Springs. He was scheduled “to sign copies of his book ‘Don’t Buy Another Vote, I Won’t Pay for a Landslide’ about West Virginia’s history of political corruption.”

The decision to impeach everyone was not one to be made lightly and it wasn’t unanimous. “If we’re talking about overturning the entire court, that’s monumental,” Delegate Barbara Fleischauer (D-Monongalia County), who is the ranking democrat on the committee, observes.

“It’s a huge thing to say the legislature feels we can cause a change in the court that will result in all four members… being chosen by the governor instead of by the people. I just can’t go that far.”

Amy Summers (R-Taylor) disagrees. “I do think the evidence is there, and I think my constituents have reached out to me with enough outrage, especially once the pictures came out and they saw the lavish spending and all the struggles we’ve been through the last few years as a state, trying to fund corrections, trying to give the teachers a pay raise.”

Taxpayers, Summers insists, see that as “a slap in their face.” Also, she says, “it shows very poor judgment.”




Season one of “Anne of Green Gables” was a heartwarming story on the events of the life of an orphaned 11 year old girl in the late 19th century Prince Edward Island, Canada. I know of several people including my wife and I, that enjoyed these episodes. We were excited to see season 2 was going to be released on Netflix.

Guess what happens when you give power and authority to leftists whose entire identity revolves around gay sex? Yes, you guessed it. No more innocent, heart warming stories about a 12 year old orphan girl struggling with the trials and tribulation of normal life. No, they need to inject their promotion of the gay lifestyle into a story that has absolutely nothing to do with the gay lifestyle. Not only have they ruined the series, they are in danger of ruining Netflix itself.

About 2 years ago those in charge of a highly successful Netflix decided they would make big changes in their programming. Keep in mind despite the large membership, Netflix is losing a ton of money. So Netflix dropped dozens of highly rated shows. Most of the older programs are gone. A new agenda of pedophilia and interjection of graphic sex and promotion of the gay agenda in their original programming.

I have stated in the past that it is the goal of the leftists to wreck everything. Whether it's smashing windows, attacking innocent people on the street, banning free speech on college campus's, censoring those with whom they disagree, persecuting athletes for mild comments made years ago or ruining television programming, their goal is to wreck it all. Sadly, so far, they are seeing success in their goals. Now who was it that was said to come to “kill, steal and destroy”?

Bruce                         New World Order News

The Colson Center for Christian Worldview has denounced a new TV version of the 1908 children’s story Anne of Green Gables for pushing a pro-LGBT agenda antithetical to the original story.

The classic children’s novel by Lucy Maud Montgomery is set in the late 19th century and tells of an 11-year-old Canadian orphan who is adopted by a brother and sister on Prince Edward Island.

The eighteen-part Netflix series, titled Anne with an E and produced and broadcast by CBC in Canada, has just begun its second season.
Given “the non-stop campaign to normalize the LGBT lifestyle,” write Eric Metaxas and Anne Morse in an article titled “Anne of Rainbow Gables? The LGBT Agenda and a Children’s Classic,” it should come as “no surprise that the most recent version introduces several homosexual characters.”

The series does not take long to introduce the LGBT agenda, the authors note, as in episode three, Anne, her friend Diana Berry, and a boy named Cole attend a “queer soiree” featuring men wearing heavy makeup and dressed as women as well as women dressed as men.

They are there, the authors note, to honor the memory of Gertrude — the “partner” of Diana’s Great-Aunt Josephine. The lesbian relationship serves to introduce Anne to another sort of “marriage.”

When Diana makes the mistake of telling Anne that the love affair between the two women was “unnatural,” she is led to enlightenment by the boy Cole who explains that love is love.

“If your aunt lived her life feeling … that she was broken, defective, or unnatural, and one day she met someone that made her realize that wasn’t true,” Cole says, “shouldn’t we be happy for her?”

Cole later confesses to Aunt Josephine that he thinks he is “like you and Gertrude,” to which the woman replies: “You have a life of such joy before you.”
After this, Anne sends the message home by asking another character: “How can there be anything wrong with a life if it’s spent with a person you love?”
The authors at the Colson Center are not the only people disturbed by the gay-themed Anne with an E.

As one viewer wrote on the Facebook page of a Christian film review site, “The gay agenda completely ruined a perfectly heartwarming and uplifting story.”

“Homosexuality is the main theme and appears in every nook and cranny of this season’s episodes,” another reviewer wrote. “If I were gay, I would be insulted by all the gross generalizations about homosexuality and the overt and repetitive presentation of the gay lifestyle as being superior to that of heterosexuals.”

Even progressive reviewer Amy Glynn could not help trashing the “woke” version of Anne of Green Gables for its clumsy and anachronistic imposition of the gay agenda.

“This show tramples the source material in a way that dilutes and arguably betrays the protagonist,” Glynn wrote Monday, with its “incredibly unsubtle overlay of 2018 sensibilities.”

The introduction of an open lesbian feminist was “patently to provoke a frenzy of bigotries and cruelties to be overcome so the audience can get a social justice primer,” she laments.

“It’s not postmodern, it’s not sardonic, it’s not playful, it’s not transgressive,” she says. “It’s a ham-handed dissertation on ‘feminism’ and ‘diversity’ and how only the terribly, terribly outcast can ever understand when something is a good idea.”

Anne with an E is, in the end, “sanctimonious twaddle that would have made the book’s author break out in hives,” she writes.




In George Orwell's book, 1984, the term “new speak” was invented. This was a new way to use words, very often in a way that is actually the opposite of the dictionary definition. The leftist organization, ANTIFA, is a great example of this tactic. Antifa — short for "anti-fascist" is actually the exact opposite. Even though “Fascism” is, in reality, a label for an economic system, its' definition has morphed into oppression through violence.

So these thugs, wearing masks and carrying clubs, attack anyone they don't like. They destroy property and they really like to gang up on people who are alone and have very little chance to defend themselves. Of course the mediawhores try to blame the victims of their violence by attempting to label them as white supremacists or right wing extremists.

So here comes these well meaning anti-fascists. Of course they are wearing masks and of course they are carrying clubs and of course they are destroying private property. This time it was a Marine recruiting office. Yes, there were arrests, but the charges are nothing. This was terrorism. If the authorities don't want to enforce the law, how about letting the Marines handle it themselves? Let's see how well these thugs do against people who can fight back.

Bruce                               New World Order News

(Gateway Pundit) – On Sunday, police arrested several far left activists at Berkeley after violence erupted while two opposing rallies were taking place.
Anti-Marxist demonstrators were met with violence by masked Antifa thugs and other far left protesters–police in riot gear wrestled the violent leftists to the ground and made arrests.
Masked Antifa terrorists used hammers to smash windows of a US Marine Corps recruiting office at Berkeley.
VIDEO: Antifa smashes the windows of Shattuck Ave US Marine Corps Recruiting office in #Berkeley #berkeleyprotests #Antifa

Antifa terrorists then threatened the man who took video of them smashing windows with hammers.
After I filmed the antifa break the Marine Corps office window and throw a torch into a dumpster, one of them called a few over to confront me. They basically told me to leave, implying attack if I didn't. I left.

"Get the fxxk back. Cops aren't here. They won't help you."
8:04 PM - Aug 5, 2018 · Oakland, CA

“Get the fxxk back. Cops aren’t here. They won’t help you,” Antifa told filmmaker, Ford Fischer.
“After I filmed the antifa break the Marine Corps office window and throw a torch into a dumpster, one of them called a few over to confront me. They basically told me to leave, implying attack if I didn’t. I left,” said Ford Fischer.
9:14 PM - Aug 5, 2018
Berkeley Police Arrest 20 During Protests from Berkeley Police Department : Nixle
The Berkeley Police Department, supported by officers from around the region, used de-escalation strategies throughout the day: separation of rival groups, confiscating weapons and arresting those ...

According to Berkeley Police, 20 people have been arrested at the time of this publication. It is unclear if the Antifa terrorists taking hammers to the US Marine Corps recruiting office were among the 20 arrested.
Berkeley Police Arrest 20 During Protests from Berkeley Police Department : Nixle
The Berkeley Police Department, supported by officers from around the region, used de-escalation strategies throughout the day: separation of rival groups, confiscating weapons and arresting those ...

Photos of some of the weapons confiscated by Berkeley Police:
[Hammer and large rocks] [Dowels and pepper spray] [A wooden pole and other objects] [Various metal poles and iron pipes]

We are confiscating weapons and making arrests.

Photos and names of some of the people arrested by Berkeley Police:

Andres Gonzalez, 35, of Oakland, was arrested at Civic Center Park on five counts of carrying a banned weapon.
Caitlin Boyle, 27, of Oakland, was arrested for working with others to commit a crime.
Bella Podolsky, 27, of San Francisco, was arrested near Civic Center Park for possession of a banned weapon.
Thomas Parker, 22, of Berkeley, was arrested near Francisco and McGee for working with others to commit a crime.
4:54 PM - Aug 5, 2018



There's a reason why history isn't taught in our public schools. If Americans knew the leftist tactics of the past, they would recognize the exact same things happening in our nation today. The Black shirts were Mussolini's Fascist thugs that terrorized Italy in the 1930's. Using the same plan, the Brown shirts were the thugs used by the Nazi's in Germany in the 1930's. Then there was the Red Guard. Primarily populated by the youth in Maoist China, 10's of thousands terrorized the population of China in the 1960's and 1970's. The object of this chaotic terror was to silence dissension and consolidate power in the hands of these terrorist organizations and take control of government.

Last weekend, well funded terrorist organizations made their presence known in Portland, Oregon, Berkeley, California and Providence, Rhode Island. They are known as ANTIFA and Black Lives matter. The titles are irrelevant. They are no different from those gangs of thugs used in the despotic movements of the past. By the way --- when they do take power, they kill. Nazi Germany killed millions. Fascist Italy killed many thousands. Communist Russia killed over 20 million of their people. Maoist China killed more than 70 million of their people. Pol Pot in Cambodia, killed over ¼ of Cambodians in the 1970's.

So, you may not like Trump. You may want him out, but here's what you don't want. You don't want the old Soviet Union. Make no mistake, these people are the real terrorists. Should they succeed in destabilizing this country and seize power, they will absolutely go on a killing spree. Remember that history class that wasn't taught?

Bruce                                      New World Order News

In a battle to try to out-fake Jim Acosta and CNN, CBS upped the ante of fake news by trying to angle a national story to pin violence on Trump supporters.
“In Portland, a massive demonstration by a right wing group turned violent,” are the first words out of Reena Ninan‘s mouth during a CBS Weekend News report on the dueling protests.

This would be true except none of the violence came from the “right wing” Trump supporting Patriot Prayer and Proud Boys. The clashes and violence were between the police and the Antifa instigators who showed up to start fight.
Ninan stumbled ahead by saying, “Police used tear gas to break up several small scuffles between and some anti fascists. Tensions were high as an officer tried to take a sign away from a woman. He ended up shoving her to the ground. When she got up and ran away, she was swarmed by several other officers.”

This would also be true except the biased Reena Ninan neglects to mention that the tear gas was directed toward the communists of Antifa, and the woman in question was one of the commies. Nina then passes the story off to Portland local reporter Jennifer Dowling of KOIN6.

Dowling’s report at least has a semblance of dignity and truth, as she focuses most of the story on antifa. But she leaves it a little fuzzy by saying, “You can see here police charging protesters who would not obey orders to disperse, and made some arrests.” They also threw in the sound-byte from the police LRAD of “Protesters throwing projectiles including rocks and bottles” and Dowling continues by talking about how police confiscated weapons and shot tear gas and flash grenades to break up the protesters.”

Except they still make it unclear as to which group that was in reference to.
Hint: It was 99% about Antifa. They were the ones who were throwing projectiles at police. They were the ones whom the police launched tear gas and flash grenades at. They were the ones who ignored orders to disperse.

On the Trump side, it was mostly peaceful, as the group marched along the waterfront. But you wouldn’t know that by CBS’s shoddy reporting.
The written piece on CBS’s website tries to pin last year’s train stabber, Jeremy Christian, as one of the right wing Trump supporters, even though he praised Bernie on his Facebook page. They also try to paint Patriot Prayer leader Joey Gibson as a racist, citing what they read on the interet posted by far left unions and pro illegal alien groups.

I think we all know what the “BS” in “CBS” stands for.




No, these aren't stories from the 1970's. These are stories from today. This is just another example of, being a leftist is being a hypocrite. Back when there were white dominated governments in South Africa and Rhodesia, there was a barrage of non-stop stories about the racism that existed in those 2 countries back then. They were correct in those complaints. Judging people on the basis of their skin color or ethnicity is wrong. We should all agree on that. Apparently our leftist friends do not.

Sadly, those who were crying crocodile tears back then are more than O.K. with being racist today, as long as they are the victimizers and not the victims. When the white government in Rhodesia was replaced by a black dominated government, an avowed Communist was put in charge, where he remained for more than 40 years. He supervised the stealing of lands from white farmers along with harassment and even killing of white residents. Whites left in droves and the economy of Zimbabwe collapsed, where it remains today.

Now the black majority government in South Africa is on the verge of doing the same thing. There is a law ready to go into effect seizing land from white farmers. Whites in South Africa are being attacked on a daily basis. Many are being killed. Thousands of others are fleeing the land and immigrating to other countries.

Where are the tears for these victims of racism? Where is the outrage from our American leftists? Dear leftists: You have no credibility. All you're looking for is to seize power for yourselves with no regard for injustice. You are hypocrites.

Bruce                                              New World Order News

South Africa Is On The Road To Barbarism
Life in a failed multi-cultural society:
Identity Politics At Work:

Notice that at a Human Rights Day rally in Mpumalanga, “human rights” is associated with “cutting the throat of whiteness.” This legitimizes the murder and dispossession of South African whites, who have been in the country longer than most blacks, as an exercise in human rights. The leader of the new black party that is challenging the one to which the former white government handed over power even has a song about shooting whites.
How many years before it happens in “diversity multi-cultural” Europe and America?

What is wrong with the Russians that they want to be associated with a West that is actively pursuing self-destruction? How long before it is not only white South Africans who are fleeing to Russia to save their lives?

Who destroyed the West? There are different answers to this question. I believe the unleashed greed of Capitalism by deregulation, the burial of Anti-Trust, and the redefinition of corporate responsibility to include only responsibility to shareholders to the detriment of employees, customers, and communities, destroyed the West. Psychology Professor Kevin McDonald thinks it was the paranoia of the Jews who protected themselves by fomenting division within the societies in which they live.

In a review of McDonald’s book, The Culture of Critique, labeled by the Israel Lobby an anti-semitic work, Stanley Hornbeck writes:
“Prof. MacDonald claims that one of the most consistent ways in which Jews have advanced their interests has been to promote pluralism and diversity – but only for others. Ever since the 19th century, they have led movements that tried to discredit the traditional foundations of gentile society: patriotism, racial loyalty, the Christian basis for morality, social homogeneity, and sexual restraint. At the same time, within their own communities, and with regard to the state of Israel, they have often supported the very institutions they attack in gentile society.

“Why is this in the interests of Jews? Because the parochial group loyalty characteristic of Jews attracts far less attention in a society that does not have a cohesive racial and cultural core. The Jewish determination not to assimilate fully, which accounts for their survival as a people for thousands for years – even without a country – has invariably attracted unpleasant and even murderous scrutiny in nations with well-defined national identities. In Prof. MacDonald’s view it is therefore in the interest of Jews to dilute and weaken the identity of any people among whom they live. Jewish identity can flower in safety only when gentile identity is weak.

“Prof. MacDonald quotes a remarkable passage from Charles Silberman: ‘American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief – one firmly rooted in history – that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of American Jews to endorse ‘gay rights’ and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called ‘social’ issues.'”

I do not know Professor MacDonald and cannot attest as to whether he is or is not an anti-semite. However, I do not see anti-semitism in his explanation, which is a rational explanation of why a paranoid people who have experienced persecution, justified or not, would strive to protect themselves by creating division in the societies in which they are a minority. The Identity Politics of the Democratic Party works perfectly in behalf of the Jewish strategy.
There is no doubt that this strategy works for Jews who feel threatened despite the enormous power that they wield over the US and Europe. The question is: Is the strategy that is successful for Jews good for the majority populations who have been turned against one another: blacks against whites, feminists against men, homosexuals against heterosexuals. Does making the white heterosexual father, son, and brother into the victimizer who victimizes everyone else a healthy formula for a successful society?

I can’t see how this question can be answered in the affirmative.

(click on the headline to access videos and pictures)

THERE will be huge food shortages and riots on the streets following plans to seize white South African farmers’ land, it has been warned.
By Rachel O'Donoghue / Published 2nd August 2018
President Cyril Ramaphosa on land expropriation proposals

Experts have said the country will face dire consequences if plans to alter the country’s constitution are pushed through.
South African President Cyril Ramaphosa recently announced plans to allow white people’s land to be taken without compensation.

It will then be distributed to black people in a move Ramaphosa said will be good for the economy.
But critics worldwide have blasted the proposed change, saying it will spark riots as well as a deep economic recession.

RIOTS: There are fears there will be civil unrest if white land is taken

CHANGE: President Cyril Ramaphosa announced the proposals this week
BRUTAL riots in South Africa at migrant protests
Xenophobia in Pretoria South Africa has reached boiling point after protests against migrants turned violent. The police used rubber bullets, tear gas and water cannon to disperse the crowd

Ian Cameron, of South African trade group AfriForum, said: “We’re really heading for a state of anarchy if something doesn’t change drastically.
“I’m convinced this year we’ll see between 21,000 to 22,000 people having been murdered in the past year.

“There are places where the police simply refuse to act. They don’t know the law well enough or refuse to apply it to logical reasoning when it comes to defending people’s property rights.”

There are also fears South Africa could become a pariah state, with other countries refusing to trade with it.
Zimbabwe election protest in pictures: Historic election turns bloody during protest
Protests in Zimbabwe's historic elections turned bloody during demonstrations over alleged vote fraud
1 / 17

Bennie Van Zyl, the general manager of the Agricultural Union of South Africa (TAU SA), said: “For us, this is a pity that they've made their choice, because no one will invest in this economy and we actually need growth to address the realities of South Africa. So we have great concern for this approach.
“A lot of foreign countries that have already contacted us as an organisation say if that is the case, we are not willing to invest in your country anymore.
"And if the ANC goes through with this, it will be devastating for this country.”



We might as well get into the racist hysteria promoted by the leftists. Sarah Jeong is mediawhore New York Times' newest employee on their editorial board. Here are some of her quotes: “Dumbass f***ing white people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants”, “Are white people genetically predisposed to burn faster in the Sun, thus logically only fit to live underground like groveling goblins”, “White people have stopped breeding. You'll all go extinct soon. That was my plan all along”.

There are many more in the subject article. What if this was said about black people? Then again, if the leftists do it, it's O.K. Just don't use the word “monkey”. If you do, you're a racist.

And the mediawhores wonder why no one listens to them any more.

Bruce                                            New World Order News


The New York Times' newest editorial board member Sarah Jeong is not a fan of "dumbass f**king white people" sharing their opinions on the internet and she wants the whole world to know it.

The Times announced on Wednesday they were hiring Sarah Jeong to join their editorial board:
Sarah Jeong is joining The New York Times editorial board. ... [Jeong] will join us in September as our lead writer on technology. ... Born in South Korea, Sarah grew up in North Carolina and California. She's both a journalist and a lawyer.
Here's their announcements: 


NYTimes Communications
[email protected] joins NYT’s editorial board. She's the newest in a fab group of recent additions to @nytopinion: Michelle Alexander @susanthequark @JenSeniorNY @karaswisher @MCottle @JInterlandi @MaraGay @JyotiThottam @talmonsmith @lauren_kelley @ByAlexMarch 
12:09 PM - Aug 1, 2018
Sarah Jeong Joins The Times’s Editorial Board
Credit: James Bareham/The Verge Sarah Jeong is joining The New York Times editorial board. Read more in this note from James Bennet, Katie Kingsbury and Jim Dao: What would it be like if we all...

Jeong's Twitter history reveals she doesn't like "dumbass f**king white people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants."


Jeong also wonders if white people's light skin is a sign they're "only fit to live underground like groveling goblins" and produced these helpful graphs showing that the whiter someone is the more "awful" they are and the more they produce a "weird dog smell when it rains."


She says she gets a sick "joy" out of "being cruel to old white men."


She thinks white people should be "canceled" and likes entertaining the notion they'll go extinct.



She thinks white people can't take credit for creating anything: 


Here she is showing her contempt for "dumbass f**king white people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants":



She thinks white men need to be targeted for more scorn:





Even the little things annoy her about white people:




Jeong also says Donald Trump is just like Hitler and Republicans make her vomit uncontrollably: 



Jeong will be starting her new job with the Times in September where she'll help churn out articles like this.


UPDATE: The New York Times released a statement on Thursday saying they knew about her tweets when they hired her and she's the real victim here:



I have said before that to be a liberal (or leftist) is to be a hypocrite. Over the past few years we have been subjected to an onslaught of ridiculous propaganda on so-called racism in our society. So desperate are these leftists that they have to reach back 160 years in order to attack those who supported the war of secession (commonly referred to the Civil War) in the U.S. Tear down the statues of Robert E. Lee. Don't let anyone display a Confederate battle flag (they think it was the official Confederate flag). Remove all of the names of Confederates from schools and public buildings. In fact, today, there is a move to rename Austin, Texas because  Stephen F. Austin was an outspoken advocate of slavery. Austin became famous for leading settlers into the area back in 1825.

Let's carry this further. If our leftist friends have their way and remove every single statue, every single work of art, every single word from the English language they deem to be offensive and every single Confederate name from all buildings, what have they accomplished? Let me answer --- nothing. Whatever happened way back then is over. All of those living at that time are dead. So are their children, grandchildren and maybe their great grandchildren. Attacking them accomplishes nothing. Why stop there? Let's attack all of the tribes and nations that allowed slavery in all of history.

This brings me to my point. If the leftists are so passionate about the slavery of the past, why are they silent on the slavery of today? Slavery exists all over the world, yet not a peep from the leftists. The subject article covers the public selling of blacks in Libya. Of course this didn't exist before the U.S. and their NATO friends “liberated” Libya. In that nation slavery is out in the open and not a peep from our leftist friends. No, they spend all of their time re-fighting the U.S. Civil War. Meanwhile, the slavery goes on without opposition.

Bruce                                            New World Order News


The reports that black Africans are being sold at slave markets in ‘liberated’ Libya for as little as $400 is a terrible indictment of the so-called ‘humanitarian intervention’ carried out by NATO to topple the government of Muammar Gaddafi in 2011.

In March 2011 virtue-signaling Western ‘liberal’ hipsters teamed up with hardcore neocon warmongers to demand action to ‘save’ the Libyan people from the ‘despotic’ leader who had ruled the country since the late 1960s. “Something has to be done!” they cried in unison.

Something was done. Libya was transformed by NATO from the country with the highest Human Development Index in the whole of Africa in 2009 into a lawless hell-hole, with rival governments, warlords and terror groups fighting for control of the country.

Under Gaddafi, Libyans enjoyed free health care and education. Literacy rates went up from around 25 percent to almost 90 percent. A UN Human Rights Council report on Libya from January 2011, in which member states praised welfare provision, can be read here. 

It was clear that while there were still areas of concern the country was continuing to make progress on a number of fronts.
In the Daily Telegraph - hardly a paper which could be accused of being an ideological supporter of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya - Libya was hailed as one of the top six exotic cruise ship destinations in June 2010.

Cruise ships don’t have Libya on their itineraries today. It’s far too dangerous.
The only surprising thing about the return of slave markets (and it’s worth pointing out that before the CNN report, the UN agency, IOM also reported on their existence in Libya earlier this year) is that anyone should be surprised by it. Human rights and social progress usually go back hundreds of years whenever a NATO ‘humanitarian’ intervention takes place. And that’s not accidental. The ‘interventions,’ which purposely involve heavy bombing of the country’s infrastructure and the subsequent dismantling of the state apparatus are designed to reverse decades of social progress. The ‘failure to plan’ is actually the most important part of the plan, as my fellow OpEdger Dan Glazebrook details in his book Divide and Destroy - The West’s Imperial Strategy in an Age of Crisis. 
Three countries, three continents: One imperial Western project — RT Op-ed
A resource-rich, socialist-led, multi-ethnic secular state, with an economic system characterized by a high level of public/social ownership and generous provision of welfare, education and social...

Libya was targeted, like Yugoslavia and Iraq before it, not because of genuine concerns that ‘another Srebrenica’ was about to take place, (note the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Select Committee report of September 2016 held that ‘the proposition that Muammar Gaddafi would have ordered the massacre of civilians in Benghazi was not supported by the available evidence’) but because it was a resource-rich country with an independently-minded government which operated a predominantly state-owned socialistic economy in a strategically important part of the world.

Neither Libya, Iraq or Yugoslavia did the bidding of the West's endless war lobby, which is why they were earmarked for destruction. The chaos which routinely follows a NATO regime change op is a ghastly experience for the locals, who see their living standards plummet and their risk of violent death in a terrorist attack greatly increase, but great for rapacious Western corporations who then move in to the ‘liberated’ country en masse, taking advantage of the lack of a strong central authority.

Of course, this is never mentioned in NATO-friendly media. The role of the Western elites in turning previously functioning welfare states into failed states is missing from most mainstream reports on the countries post ‘liberation.'

In his recent piece for FAIR, journalist Ben Norton noted how reports “overwhelmingly spoke of slavery in Libya as an apolitical and timeless human rights issue, not as a political problem rooted in very recent history.”

The dominant narrative is that slave markets have re-emerged in Libya ‘as if by magic,’just like Mr. Benn’s shopkeeper. The country’s ’instability’ is mentioned, but not the cause of that instability, namely the violent overthrow of the country’s government in 2011 and the Western backing of extremist, and in some cases blatantly racist, death squads. Everyone is blamed for the mess except the powerful, protected people and lobbyists who are ultimately responsible.

The French government played a leading role in the destruction of Libya in 2011, yet today the French president, the ‘progressive’ Emmanuel Macron blames ‘Africans’ for the country’s slavery problem. “Who are the traffickers? Ask yourselves – being the African youth – that question. You are unbelievable. Who are the traffickers? They are Africans, my friends. They are Africans.”

Macron, like other Western leaders, wants us to see the slavery issue in close-up, and not in long-shot. Because if we do, NATO comes into the picture.
There is similar whitewashing over Iraq and the rise of ISIS. Again, we are supposed to regard the group’s emergence as “just one of those things.” But ISIS was not a force when the secular Baathist Saddam Hussein ruled Iraq; it only grew following his ousting and the chaos which followed the occupiers’ dismantling of the entire state apparatus.

The result of intervening in Libya has been "disappointing at the very least", says Observer leader, arguing against action in Syria. Balls.

Six-and-a-half years on, it’s revealing to look back at the things the cheerleaders for the ‘humanitarian intervention’ in Libya were saying in early 2011 and what actually happened as a result of NATO’s 26,500 sorties.

“The price of inaction is too high” was the title of one piece by David Aaronovitch in The Times, dated March 18, 2011. “If we don’t bomb Gadaffi’s tanks, Europe is likely to face a wave of refugees and a new generation of jihadis,” was the synopsis. 

Guess what? The West's military alliance did bomb Gaddafi’s tanks (and a lot more besides) and we got “a wave of refugees” of Biblical proportions and “a new generation of jihadis,” including the Manchester Arena bomber, Salman Abedi.

But there’s been no mea culpa from Aaronovitch, nor from his Times colleague Oliver Kamm - who attacked me after I had penned an article in the Daily Express calling for NATO to halt its action.

In the Telegraph, Matthew d’Ancona wrote a piece entitled ‘Libya is Cameron’s chance to exorcise the ghost of Iraq.' 
In fact, the experience of Iraq should have led all genuine humanitarians to oppose the NATO assault. In many ways, as John Wight argues here,
Libya was an even worse crime than the invasion of Iraq because it came afterward. There was really no excuse for anyone seeing how the ‘regime change’ operation of 2003 had turned out, supporting a similar venture in North Africa.

Unsurprisingly the politicians and pundits who couldn’t stop talking about Libya in 2011 and the West's ‘responsibility to protect’ civilians seem less keen to talk about the country today.

Libya and its problems have vanished from the comment pages. It’s the same after every Western ‘intervention’: saturation coverage before and during the ‘liberation,’ bellicose calls from the totally unaccountable neocon/liberal punditocracy for military action to ‘save the people’ from the latest ‘New Hitler,’ and then silence afterwards as the country hurtles back in time to the Dark Ages.

The ‘liberators’ of Libya have moved on to other more important things in 2017, with Russophobia the current obsession. Anything, in fact, to distract us from the disastrous consequences of their actions.

POSTED JULY 31, 2018


The subject article covers members of Congress, the Senate and their staffers having large amounts of prescription drugs delivered to Capitol Hill on a daily basis. No, we don't know all of those who are on medication. No, we don't know how much they are taking and no, we don't know the conditions being treated. Ask yourself why don't we know?

In an era of instant communication, we, in the public, are subjected to non-stop surveillance. Almost everything we say and do is subject to this surveillance. I know, it's to keep us safe. Isn't it interesting that our government masters are exactly the opposite? What do you know about your representative? Can you ever speak with him or her? Have you ever seen him or her in a local restaurant or grocery store? No, they don't mix with us. Also, if they are suffering from a mental or physical disease, you will never know it. You won't know if they have all of their faculties. All of what you know about your representative is in a carefully scripted press release.

Meanwhile we are subjected to rants from Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters or John McCain. When someone in your family loses it, it's a tragedy. When someone in a position of power loses it, wars can start. Maybe this article can explain some of the reasons that some of those in Washington look like they're having a nervous breakdown.

Bruce                                                     New World Order News

In October 2017, a story ran on the Internet which caused an uproar within the beltway aka The Swamp. Members of Congress who are busy destroying this country get their meds delivered to the capitol (apparently staff also receive this service). But, that’s not what caused social media to go bonkers.
A pharmacist and owner of a quaint old-style pharmacy in Washington, DC, Grubbs Pharmacy, said:
Uproar as Capitol Hill pharmacist dishes on Alzheimer's prescriptions for the powerful                                                

“The owner of the Capitol Hill pharmacy that supplies prescription drugs for members of Congress and staff has sparked a frenzy of speculation after claiming he gives meds to lawmakers with “pretty serious health problems” and appearing to question their mental faculties. 

“At first it’s cool, and then you realize, I’m filling some drugs that are for some pretty serious health problems as well. And these are the people that are running the country,” Grubb's Pharmacy's Dr. Michael Kim told STAT News, reportedly citing treatments for conditions like diabetes and Alzheimer’s.
“It makes you kind of sit back and say, ‘Wow, they’re making the highest laws of the land and they might not even remember what happened yesterday,'” he said. “

In less than 24 Hours, Dr. Michael Kim was trying to dig himself out of a big hole: “The comment was made in a hypothetical joking way which was not conveyed in the article,” Kim said in an email. “I know that patient privacy and serious health conditions are no joking matter and I’m sorry that the comments gave the impression that I was actually talking about someone specific, but I was only talking in a speculative manner without anyone in mind.”
So, once again, we have comments taken out of context: “I’m filling some drugs that are for some pretty serious health problems as well.” It seems to me that is a pretty clear statement from the horse’s mouth.

He was only speaking in a ‘speculative manner’ without anyone in mind yet his interview dealt with filling prescriptions for members of Congress, not the general public. He said “They’re running the country” and” making laws”. Civilians don’t have that power.

There’s no question in my mind Nancy Pelsoi has dementia that is worsening. I’ve been dealing with it with my 90-year old mother for the past several years. No, it doesn’t get any better. The repetition of the same subject matter over and over, can’t remember what she said five minutes earlier on the phone, confusion, mild panic when her mind goes blank. It’s very sad and takes a great deal of love and compassion dealing with someone who has dementia or Alzheimer’s.

Pelosi has been displaying all the classic signs of dementia for the past couple of years; she is 78 years old. And, like too many who make being a member of Congress a lifelong career, it appears Pelosi intends to stay in office until she drops dead at the podium. OR, her party does the responsible and morally right thing: Have a private conversation with her that it’s time to retire.

You can see it in these videos at different times as she lies through her teeth. Moments when she tries not to panic as her mind goes blank. I’ve seen it with my mom many, many times.

Nancy Pelosi SLURS Words Has Mini SEIZURE During Live Speech
I don’t believe Pelosi has Alzheimer’s although I think she’s getting to the early onset of that terrible disease. I worked part time for the Texas Veterans Home in my area one summer and had 20 hours of formal training on dementia and Alzheimer’s; I was eventually assigned to the dementia wing. Is Pelosi on the path to Alzheimer’s? I say very likely as sadly, it is the progression for many who suffer from dementia:

Pelsoi Altzheimer's Meltdown/Pelosi Caught in Incoherent Live TV Ramble
Encourage Speaker Ryan to require that Nancy Pelosi submit to a Psychiatric Evaluation, July14, 2018

How about mad Max (Maxine) Waters? Another U.S. Representative who should have left Congress decades ago. She is 79 years old and has done nothing but foster racism and show her rank stupidity since she’s been in office; Waters has been in Congress since 1991.
Is Waters simply crazy as in crazy or does she also suffer from dementia? I believe a little of both but she should not be serving in the most powerful body of politicians on this planet.

How about drunks and drug addicts serving in Congress?
Rep. Radel Joins Capitol's Most Secret Club - Recovering Addicts
“When Rep. Trey Radel pleaded guilty today to cocaine possession and promised to enter rehab, he joined the ranks of one of Capitol Hill's most secretive and exclusive clubs -- addicts.

“For more than a decade, members of Congress, struggling with addiction, have met behind closed doors in Georgetown, on Capitol Hill, at a church across the street from the Capitol, and, on some mornings at a hotel on Pennsylvania Avenue.
“Just last year Jesse Jackson Jr., a Democrat from Illinois resigned his office, partly to go into rehab for drug and alcohol abuse. Between 1991 to 2009, former congressman Jim Ramstad publicly mentored several congressmen with drug or alcohol problems.

“But at least three other members of Congress secretly came to Ramstad seeking help for addiction, he told Ramstad said he did not know how many current members were in treatment. In almost every instance the veil of secrecy and lies is inopportunely lifted when a congressman is caught by police abusing drugs and there is little choice but to come clean.

"[Members of Congress] represent the country which includes millions of addicts and members aren't exempt," said Patrick Kennedy, a former congressman from Rhode Island who came forward about his addiction to prescription drugs after a 2006 automobile accident in which he drove his car into a Capitol Hill barricade. He later pleaded guilty to driving under the influence.“

Rep. Tom Garrett of Virginia drops bid for re-election, cites alcoholism, 2018 – One term drunk who is a member of the highly touted Freedom Caucus.
There’s a growing list of sexual deviants in the House and Senate; lesbians, homosexuals and bi-sexual. Are any of them getting prescriptions to treat HIV/AIDS that cost a King’s ransom paid for by you and me? Well, that certainly is a privacy issue that should remain private. But I say shame on voters for putting them in office. Men having sex in each other’s feces and sticking their fists in another man’s rectum and women slobbering in each other’s vagina is a choice, not “born that way”.

Do we the people have the right to know if a member of Congress is taking medications for serious mental health issues like dementia and Alzheimer’s? How about prescription drugs for depression (SSRIs) that have horrible, dangerous side effects? Not high blood pressure, diabetes and things like that. I’m talking serious mental health issues.

I believe, regardless of party, the answer is yes. Members of Congress have access to our highest national security intelligence information. They confirm judges and ratify treaties. They make the laws we are forced to live under unless over turned by a court. Some of them meet with high ranking officials of foreign governments.

If they are being treated for dementia, Alzheimer’s or on those heavy duty anti-depressant drugs I believe they represent a danger to this country and should NOT be in office. Period.

Depression is a very serious mental health issue and can be a dangerous one. Not only for the individual but the public. Not to mention the real possibility of blackmail. Either you vote for this bill or your drinking problem or whatever it is will get leaked to the press.
Members of Congress who are drunks on the job need to resign. Until they’re caught, they are in office voting on legislation that affects our lives and this country regarding foreign policy, treaties, judges and more. Remember what the column above said:

“But at least three other members of Congress secretly came to Ramstad seeking help for addiction, he told Ramstad said he did not know how many current members were in treatment.

“In almost every instance the veil of secrecy and lies is inopportunely lifted when a congressman is caught by police abusing drugs and there is little choice but to come clean.”

How about the ones never outed like former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, Johnny Wino Boehner? There’s NO doubt in my mind Johnny was and probably still is a ‘functioning’ alcoholic; it was no secret he was drunk by 2:00 pm just about every day.
He was too powerful. Good old Johnny retired with a full pension; you and I will be paying his booze bill for the rest of his life while he lives in an $800,000 condo in Florida, playing golf and making buku bux sitting on three boards; one for a lobbying firm, one for the second largest tobacco company ($400,000 a year), one for legal marijuana.

Closet alcoholics serving in Congress are deceiving their constituents and need to resign and get help. If you think the top of the food chain in the House and Senate don’t know some of those dirty little secrets, think again. I’ve been to DC many, many times. It was common talk around town and from several trusted sources of mine everyone knew Boehner was a drunk.

I tried hard to find this article I read several years ago about a Congressman who retired and then came clean. I think he was from Pennsylvania and had served in Congress for two decades. Only after he left office with his full pension did he come clean and admit in his own words he was drunk every day on the job.

I realize alcohol and pills are addictions but we’re not talking about a kid who works at the local convenience store. They need to resign and get treatment on their own. Too many addicts hide falling off the wagon for the booze and pills. They simply cannot remain on the job.

Of course, they won’t do it because they want you to pay for their treatment AND being a member of the U.S. Congress is so exclusive and powerful, the majority of them never want to give up that power.

Dirty, filthy politician Paul Ryan is retiring and will no longer be Speaker of the House. Whoever becomes the next speaker needs to make this a priority. Yes, medical records are private and must absolutely be protected.

But, when you have such obvious displays of mental decline like dementia or the onset of Alzheimer’s by a member of Congress, he/she must resign. The same goes for members of the U.S. Supreme Court like Comrade Ruth Bader Ginsburg, age 85.

Justice Ginsburg: Not '100% sober' at State of the Union
“As she did two years ago, Ginsburg admitted Thursday night that, yes, the photos of her appearing to nod off at President Obama's big speech last month showed her dozing. "As I often do," she said.
“But there was a good reason, she added: "I wasn't 100% sober."
Snorer in the court? Ruth Bader Ginsburg snoozes, Justice dozes off during political redistricting hearing, colleagues let her sleep, March 3, 2006 (That was 12 years ago when she was 73)

Chief Justice John Roberts: Get off your worthless ass and quietly force Ginsburg to retire unless you want the spectacle of her ‘nodding off’ only to discover she’s actually dead during oral arguments.

The Speaker of the House, United States House of Representatives and the big crook, Senate Majority Leader, Mitch McConnell, are the ones who must take this on because it is the right thing to do. For the sake of the individual and the country.

We the people have the right to know if the person they voted for is mentally capable of remaining on the job. In the case of Pelosi, she should have been forced out at least a year ago. We’ll see what the next Speaker of the House does on this if enough Americans demand action.


POSTED JULY 30, 2018


If you have been reading these posts, you know the “spoiled brat” is the Israeli government. This is not to be confused with the Israeli people. In fact many of the residents in Israel oppose many of the policies of their government, but that's the case with most governments.

I've posted a few headlines from the past couple of days concerning the Israeli government activities. They've committed piracy in international waters. They've killed more innocent, unarmed civilians, including children. They've looked the other way when the so-called settlers have burned crops and destroyed property belonging to Palestinians.

Let's ask this question: Is there any other nation on the face of the earth that could commit these crimes and not even have it mentioned in the media? Is there any other nation on earth that could use military force against sovereign nations, seize ships in international waters and kill civilians and not have it opposed by one or more of the major powers? When you allow criminal behavior, you ask for more of it. Criminal behavior is progressive. When a government is not stopped, sooner or later they make it necessary for those suffering these offenses, to respond.

Bruce                                         New World Order News

POSTED JULY 27, 2018


I really, really don't want to post any more articles on the ongoing investigations into government corruption by our government masters, but today's subject article has to be posted. While Americans are busy just trying to deal with every day problems, our government masters have also been busy ----- for a very long time. They have been busy consolidating power. They have been busy stealing money from the taxpayers. They have been busy putting their crooked friends into positions of power and the judiciary. They have been busy getting rid of anyone who is honest and wants to serve the American public. They have been busy covering up their crimes and punishing anyone who would expose them. They have been busy taking over the entire media and feeding them non-stop propaganda.

So, in the subject article, it very simply identifies just a few a the very obvious criminal activities on the part of some of our government masters. It also shows how they put their stooges into positions to investigate, then exonerate, their friends.

This problem is so pervasive, there is no solution. There are so many crimes. There is almost nobody in a position of power who is willing to indict the criminals. There is so much money that has disappeared from the Treasury. There is so much money owed by the government, that no solution is possible. It's not new. Many governments and empires have gone down this road. Towards the end, those in charge go insane. They escalate their criminal behavior. They get violent both domestically and internationally. The foundation was and is, the desire for more and more money and more and more power. When the money ends, so do they. Unfortunately, they drag their subjects down with them.

In past posts I have said that they have to go --- all of them. I hoped and continue to hope that it will go peacefully as it did in the Soviet Union, but one thing is absolutely sure. They will go. Their greed and hubris is their undoing. Let's hope the rest of us can survive the damage that has been done. It won't be easy.

Bruce                                        New World Order News

by SuperCharged2000
None other than James Comey. Isn’t that interesting…
Guess who was transferred in to the Internal Revenue Service to run the Tax Exemption Branch of the IRS?
Lois Lerner.

Now, that’s interesting, isn’t it?

It gets better, well not really, but this is all just a series of strange coincidences, right?
Guess who ran the Tax Division inside the Department of Injustice from 2001 to 2005?

None other than the Assistant Attorney General of the United States, Rod Rosenstein.
Now, that’s interesting, isn’t it?

Guess who was the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation during this time frame?

I know, it’s a miracle, just a coincidence, just an anomaly in statistics and chances, Robert Mueller.
What do all four casting characters have in common?

They all were briefed and/or were front line investigators into the Clinton Foundation Investigation.
Now that’s just a coincidence, right?

Ok, lets chalk the last one up to mere chance.

Let’s fast forward to 2009.
James Comey leaves the Justice Department to go and cash-in at Lockheed Martin.

Hillary Clinton is running the State Department, on her own personal email server by the way.
The Uranium One “issue” comes to the attention of the Hillary.

Like all good public servants do, you know looking out for America’s best interest, she decides to support the decision and approve the sale of 20% of US Uranium to none other than, the Russians.

Now you would think that this is a fairly straight up deal, except it wasn’t, the People got absolutely nothing out of it.
However, prior to the sales approval, none other than Bill Clinton goes to Moscow, gets paid $500 K for a one-hour speech then meets with Vladimir Putin at his home for a few hours.

Ok, no big deal, right?

Well, not so fast, the FBI had a mole inside the money laundering and bribery scheme.

Guess who was the FBI Director during this timeframe?
Yep, Robert Mueller.

He even delivered a Uranium Sample to Moscow in 2009.

Guess who was handling that case within the Justice Department out of the US Attorney’s Office in Maryland.

None other than, yup, Rod Rosenstein.

Guess what happened to the informant?

The Department of Justice placed a GAG order on him and threatened to lock him up if he spoke out about it.

How does 20% of the most strategic asset of the United States of America end up in Russian hands when the FBI has an informant, a mole providing inside information to the FBI on the criminal enterprise?

Guess what happened soon after the sale was approved?
145 million dollars in “donations” made their way into the Clinton Foundation from entities directly connected to the Uranium One deal.

Guess who was still at the Internal Revenue Service working the Charitable Division?

None other than, you got it. Lois Lerner.

Ok, that’s all just another series of coincidences, nothing to see here, right?
Let’s fast forward to 2015.

Due to a series of tragic events in Benghazi and after the 9 “investigations” the House, Senate and at State Department, Trey Gowdy who was running the 10th investigation as Chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi, discovers that the Hillary ran the State Department on an unclassified, unauthorized, outlaw personal email server.

He also discovered that none of those emails had been turned over when she departed her “Public Service” as Secretary of State which was required by law.

He also discovered that there was Top Secret information contained within her personally archived email.

Sparing you the State Departments cover up, the nostrums they floated, the delay tactics that were employed and the outright lies that were spewed forth from the necks of the Kerry State Department, we shall leave it with this…… they did everything humanly possible to cover for Hillary.
Now this is amazing, guess who became FBI Director in 2013?

Guess who secured 17 no bid contracts for his employer (Lockheed Martin) with the State Department and was rewarded with a six million dollar thank you present when he departed his employer.

None other than our pal, James Comey.

Amazing how all those no-bids just went right through at State, huh?

Now he, of course, is the FBI Director in charge of the “Clinton Email Investigation” (after, of course, his FBI Investigates the Lois Lerner “Matter” at the Internal Revenue Service and, of course, exonerates her).

Nope couldn’t find any crimes there.

Can you guess what happened next?

In April 2016, James Comey drafts an exoneration letter of Hillary Rodham Clinton, meanwhile the DOJ is handing out immunity deals like candy.

They didn’t even convene a Grand Jury.

Like a lightning bolt of statistical impossibility, like a miracle from God himself, like the true “Gangsta” Homey is, James steps out into the cameras of an awaiting press conference on July the 8th of 2016 and exonerates the Hillary from any wrongdoing.
Can you see the pattern?

It goes on and on, Rosenstein becomes Asst. Attorney General, Comey gets fired based upon a letter by Rosenstein, Comey leaks government information to the press, Mueller is assigned to the Russian Investigation sham by Rosenstein to provide cover for decades of malfeasance within the FBI and DOJ and the story continues.

FISA abuse, political espionage…. pick a crime, any crime, chances are…… this group and a few others were deeply involved in it.
All the same players.

All compromised and conflicted.

All working fervently to NOT go to jail themselves.

All connected in one way or another to the Clintons.

They are like battery acid, they corrode and corrupt everything they touch.
How many lives have these two destroyed?

As of this writing, the Clinton Foundation, in its 20+ years of operation of being the largest International Charity Fraud in the history of mankind, has never been audited by the Internal Revenue Service.

Let us not forget that Comey’s brother works for DLA Piper, the law firm that does the Clinton Foundation’s taxes.


POSTED JULY 26, 2018


Well here we are. A few months ago we had a workable agreement between major powers and the government of Iran. Iran agreed to international inspections and those inspectors have certified that Iran is complying fully with the terms of the agreement.

So here comes President Trump. He not only has pulled out of the agreement, thus going back on the word of the United States, but he has threatened war against Iran. Don't we have enough never ending wars? So on to the subject article. Top commander of the IRGC, Major General Mohammad Ali Jafari has claimed that an oil threat can be easily answered. Keep in mind that the Strait of Hormuz at its narrowest is about 31 miles wide. So it goes without saying that keeping this open would be a monumental task in the face of hostilities.

If the U.S. starts a war with Iran or even just starts bombing, you can bet that most of the super tankers will not travel to and from the Persian Gulf. These tankers are massive and travel very slow. They are an easy target. There is also the possibility of mines being deployed in the Gulf. Yes, the U.S. Navy can win a naval battle with Iran. It is also obvious that the U.S. has the technology to remove mines from the Gulf, but here is what they can't do. They can't reassure shipping companies that their ships, cargo and crew will be safe. They can't reassure insurance companies that the ships, crew and cargo will be safe. Iran doesn't have to win a naval battle. All they have to do is scare the shipping companies. This whole fiasco is totally unnecessary and very stupid.

Bruce                                                 New World Order News

Iran's elite Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corp (IRGC) has responded to President Donald Trump's prior Sunday all caps twitter tirade warning Iran to "NEVER, EVER THREATEN THE UNITED STATES AGAIN OR YOU WILL SUFFER CONSEQUENCES THE LIKES OF WHICH FEW THROUGHOUT HISTORY HAVE EVER SUFFERED BEFORE..."
Top commander of the IRGC, Major General Mohammad Ali Jafari, doesn't appear to have taken the US president's words to heart, however, saying Wednesday,
If the current capabilities of the Revolutionary Guards ... reaches the ears of the adventure-seeking president of America, he will never make this kind of mistake and will reach the understanding that an oil threat can be easily answered. 
The IRGC chief appears to be referencing prior warnings from Iran's leaders that it could cut off the world's oil supply from the region, sending prices soaring. 

Iran and Washington are in the midst of a war of words, with the dangerous potential for an actual war seeming to rise daily, as the US has repeatedly threatened to throttle Iran's international oil trade as it's moved closer to imposing sanctions on countries including key allies that don’t eliminate or significantly cut imports of Iranian oil by Nov. 4. It's but the latest crisis to emerge after the White House pulled the US out of the 2015 Iran nuclear deal in May. 

Earlier this summer on July 4th Iran's President Hassan Rouhani suggested Iran could stop all regional gulf oil exports in retaliation for the US seeking to collapse the nuclear deal, and in response to aggressive new US sanctions: "The Americans say they want to reduce Iranian oil exports to zero... It shows they have not thought about its consequences," he said. This was followed by a published letter from Quds force leader (the special forces foreign action wing of the IRGC) Qassem Soleimani who narrowed the threat, writing "Your comments, carried by the media, that if the Islamic Republic’s oil isn’t exported there would be no guarantees for the whole region’s oil to be exported, is a very valuable comment."

Since that time and after subsequent threats, Washington has kept a close eye on the Straight of Hormuz in the Persian Gulf, with the Pentagon threatening a military response if necessary, as such threats of halting oil exports out of the gulf coming particular from the Revolutionary Guard is particularly alarming. Soleimani and his IRGC Quds unit are precisely the ones who would oversee such an operation as blocking Gulf exports. 
The Straight of Hormuz at its narrowest is about 31 miles wide and approximately one-third of the world's seaborne oil passes through it, annd the IRGC has in the past threatened the passageway by conducting war games, such as during a period of heightened tensions with the West over the straight in 2011 and 2012.

On Wednesday Iran's Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a statement through official sources, saying the US should forget about any and all negotiations so long as Iran remains under threat. 

"Iran has never hesitated and will never do so to defend the people's rights, territorial integrity, and independence of the country,' said spokesman Bahram Qasemi, adding that "one-way negotiations" in the current political climate are impossible. 

Meanwhile, oil prices have moved higher early this week on reports that tensions continue to escalatebetween the US and Iran, accompanying the heightened war of words over the Persian Gulf waterway.

Iran's OPEC governor, Hossein Kazempour Ardebili, earlier in July weighed in on the issue with dire warnings in statements carried by Iran's oil ministry news agency SHANA.

“Trump’s demand that Iranian oil should not be bought, and (his) pressures on European firms at a time when Nigeria and Libya are in crisis, when Venezuela’s oil exports have fallen due to U.S. sanctions, when Saudi’s domestic consumption has increased in summer, is nothing but self harm,” Ardebili said. 

“It will increase the prices of oil in the global markets,” he said, and echoing Rouhani's theme of US "self-harm" he added, “At the end it is the American consumer who will pay the price for Mr. Trump’s policy.”

POSTED JULY 25, 2018

Trey Gowdy: After 18 Months, There’s NO EVIDENCE Of Russian Collusion. What else is there “no evidence of”?

Yes, we have been treated to a non-stop parade of Russia collusion crap accompanied by foot stomping and bluster from representatives like Trey Gowdy and others.

The subject article and headline uses the term “no evidence of” after this 18 month long investigation. Here are some other things we, the people, see no evidence of: There is no evidence that Hillary Clinton will be prosecuted. There is no evidence that Brennan, Clapper, Comey and Mueller will have their illegal activities investigated. There is no evidence that committing perjury before the Congress will subject those committing it to be cited for the crime. There is no evidence our elected representatives will conduct any meaningful investigation into vote fraud. There is no evidence there will be any legislation to prevent vote fraud. There is no evidence that those bureaucrats who are aiding and abetting illegal immigration will be prosecuted for their criminal activities. There is no evidence that Congress, who is empowered by the Constitution in the declaration of war, will do anything to stop all of the wars being prosecuted around the world.

So, pardon me, Congressman Gowdy, but I have had enough. Enough of the tough talk and enough of the B.S. You and the others who live off the fat of the land are entirely useless. If all we wanted was to hire people who talk and do nothing else, we could buy 535 parrots. I have said it before and am saying it again --- all of you need to go.

Bruce                              New World Order News


POSTED JULY 24, 2018


Are all immigrants good people? I doubt that anyone would say they are, but let's go further. Are all people in America good? Are all people in your city good? Is everyone in your family good? Sadly, we have to take precautions in not exposing ourselves and our loved ones to potential danger from people. Some people we know are dangerous. Some others that we don't know are also dangerous.

If one has made the mistake of spending time reading newspapers or viewing programs from the mediawhores, you would think that everyone coming over our borders without any vetting is good. They are hard working people looking for a better life. They come into our country and their children are ripped away from them, scared and crying. Knowing that there are no groups of any kind that are 100% good, it stands to reason that a percentage of those coming here illegally are not good and may be criminals.

The subject article covers crime statistics on those who have come here illegally. One must also take into account that not every criminal gets caught. It's really very simple. All nations have rules covering the entry of non citizens into their country. As much as we don't like to see crying children who have become victims in being brought into our nation illegally, we must also have compassion for the thousands of Americans who have been victimized by criminal behavior on the part of illegal aliens. One must also remember that many of those victims are themselves immigrants.

Bruce                                                  New World Order News

Editor, Casa Grande Dispatch:

Recently the U.S. Congress was issued an update on many of our laws broken by illegal aliens from 2017 on. There were more then 80,000 DUIs, 48,000 assaults, 11,000 weapons violations, 15,000 sexual assaults, 2,000 kidnappings, 1,800 homicides, 4,818 arrests for gang activity, 8067 pounds of heroin, 98,000 narcotics violations.

For all you never-Trumpers who hate America, law enforcement and the military: Don't forget your prayers at night that your children, grandchildren or great-grandchildren are not one of these casualties.

Continue loving Obama, Schumer, Pelosi and Waters, who want open borders, unlimited amnesty and doubling of our national debt under Obama, more then all the previous 43 presidents combined.

Richard Waggoner

POSTED JULY 23, 2018



In Trump's book, The Art of the Deal, he takes pleasure in a negotiation tactic. That tactic is to demand the impossible and threaten destruction. Of course, this tactic was used in the financial world, not the world of international relations. It's one thing to threaten someone in the financing and operation of a casino and another to threaten someone with nuclear war. Even in the financial world, sometimes they call your bluff. Indeed, many years ago, Trump and Merv Griffin had frequent sparing matches which Trump did not always win.

So here we are, just one week past the summit with Putin. Global tensions seemed to be ratcheted down. The leaders agreed to talk about further cooperation. Then comes another, stupid threat of the annihilation of a sovereign nation. It wasn't that long ago Trump used this same tactic against North Korea. I am not sure, but guessing that those in positions of power in Russia, China and other countries are accepting the inevitable. That would be that sooner or later the U.S. will attack -----someone. Then it's on. It also can be that having made these threats over and over again, no one believes them anymore. Either way this is stupid and can be very dangerous.

Bruce                                   New World Order News

On Sunday Iranian President Hassan Rouhani urged his US counterpart Donald Trump to stop playing with fire, referring to Washington's calls for its allies to completely abandon imports of Iranian oil by early November.

US President Donald Trump warned Tehran on Sunday of consequences "the likes of which few throughout history have ever suffered," if the country threatens the United States.

The Iranian president said earlier that a "war with Iran is the mother of all wars," but did not rule out peace between the two countries.
"Today, speaking with US has no meaning except surrender and end of people's achievements. Mr. Trump! We are the people of dignity and guarantor of security of the waterway of the region throughout the history. Don't play with the lion's tail; you will regret it," Rouhani said at a meeting with Iranian diplomats as quoted by the presidential office.

The Iranian president also said that Iran's power was of a defensive nature, adding that the country was not fighting against anyone. "But the enemies must understand well that war with Iran is the mother of all wars and peace with Iran is the mother of all peace. We have never been intimidated and will respond threat with threat," Rouhani stressed.

US Secretary of State Michael Pompeo delivered a speech Sunday entitled "Supporting Iranian Voices" at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library and Center for Public Affairs, in which he compared the Iranian government to the mafia.
"Iran is run by something that resembles the mafia more than a government," Pompeo said

President Rouhani Says US ‘More Isolated Than Ever’ Over Iran Sanctions
In early May, US President Donald Trump announced that the United States would be pulling out of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), commonly known as the Iran nuclear deal, signed in 2015 in Vienna by Iran, the European Union, China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, the United States and Germany.

In addition, the US president decided to reinstate wide-ranging sanctions on Iran, previously lifted under the agreement in exchange for Tehran maintaining the peaceful nature of its nuclear program. Washington's unilateral move has been opposed by other parties to the nuclear deal.